Former Chief Justices Back Joint Polls, Question Election Commission Bill’s Sweep

India’s former Chief Justices have weighed in on the controversial topic of simultaneous elections, affirming their constitutionality while raising serious concerns about the potential impact of a proposed bill on the Election Commission’s independence and authority.

Constitutional Validity of Joint Polls Affirmed

The former Chief Justices unequivocally supported the concept of holding simultaneous elections, agreeing that it aligns with the framework of the Indian Constitution. They emphasized the potential benefits of such a system, including reduced costs, administrative burdens, and disruptions to governance.

Concerns Raised Over Election Commission Bill

However, the former Chief Justices expressed reservations about the sweeping powers granted to the Executive branch under the proposed Election Commission bill. They argued that these changes could undermine the independence of the Election Commission, a cornerstone of India’s democratic process. The potential for political interference in the appointment and functioning of the Commission was a key concern highlighted by the legal experts.

Impact on Election Integrity Questioned

The former Chief Justices cautioned that diminishing the Election Commission’s autonomy could compromise the integrity of the electoral process and erode public trust in the fairness of elections. They urged careful consideration of the bill’s implications for the future of Indian democracy.